🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial action to restrict social platforms access for young people below 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and parents are observing intently to see if this strategy will become a template for countries abroad.

Across Europe Trend

In Europe, a increasing chorus of nations are considering similar measures.

• The Danish government has stated a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader stating that phones and networks are "stealing our youngsters' youth". The policy is expected to be enacted soon.
• Norway is planning to implement a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard young people from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to confirm the identity and age of social media users. Officials have indicated that an Australia-style ban remains "an measures under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has asked parliament to pass a bill increasing the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has endorsed a similar action, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has advised parents to restrict their youngsters from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has adopted a non-binding statement demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 except if a parent decides otherwise is granted. Although it cautions of the "addictive" quality of these services, the move does not create mandatory rules.

"An effective age barrier is a solid first step," commented a leading MEP driving the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Stance

In the UK, the government has not ruled out a future ban, arguing that "no measure is off the table" but stressing any policy must be "grounded in robust evidence".

Last year, support gathered behind a proposal to enact limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually modified. Nonetheless, the government committed to conduct more studies the matter.

Advocacy groups have expressed warnings. An organization established by the loved ones of a young person who died after viewing disturbing platform posts argues that a strict age ban might not improve online safety and could create a "dangerous transition" of risk when young people turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the refusal of the tech sector to build products and services that are secure and fit for minors," said a leading peer.

The United States: A Decentralized Picture

Stateside, regulation is primarily happening at the regional government level amid country-wide inaction.

• The state of Utah requires guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has passed a law banning those below 14 from joining social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a rule limiting teenagers to a single hour of social media time per day, with extra use requiring a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced laws demanding adult authorization for under-16s to create social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and calls from various individuals to copy this lead, a US-wide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Views

Apart from Europe and the US, other nations are also considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, global organizations strike a more nuanced stance. The UN children's agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "may even have unintended consequences". The body points out that social networks can be a "critical link" for vulnerable youth and that government action should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to invest in user protection.

As this global debate continues, the actions of this nation and its followers demonstrate that states globally are less and less willing to wait for the industry to self-regulate.