🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, star Jude Law stated he had no concerns about backlash for playing Vladimir Putin in a cinematic adaptation. The movie, however, may align too neatly with the mythologized version promoted by Russian state media that, domestically, it reads as a compliment rather than a critique.

The Crafted Superhero

For years, the Russian political apparatus and the country's pop-culture machine have collaborated to craft a made-to-measure version of the president. This figure is a political superhero without age or mistakes, a former spy reimagined as a local 007 who consistently understands beyond what he shows.

“Domestically, the constructed Putin has long overshadowed the real one.”

Screen-Based Support

A notable instance is a TV series launched last October, helmed by a pro-government filmmaker. Its main character is a fictional blue-eyed lieutenant colonel selected by fate to “save” Russia from chaos. While the character's name Mikhail, the message is clear: the hero must be a known figure from the secret services.

Western portrayals frequently result in buttressing this same narrative rather than debunking it. A new film inspired by a popular book aims to subvert the Putin cult by presenting him as a symptom but as a symptom, shifting the narrative weight to the spin doctors surrounding him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

On screen, Putin is shown as having been picked by influential figures to steady the nation because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. The oligarchs approach him and all but beg him to become president. His response is that he would rather govern from the background, seeking permanent power.

This tale is a key piece of state propaganda: the cool, reluctant strategist guided by fate. In reality, these events ever happened.

The Reality of the Casting Call

Nobody ever begged him to accept the role. The presidency was in essence a casting call with many contenders. Central to this process stood an influential oligarch from the previous administration who expected to run the country in practice.

• His list included several politicians, among them a reformer subsequently assassinated and a security service director.
• Per an expert who studied Putin’s biography, the chosen candidate merely met the required parameters: obedient, from the intelligence world, and politically neutral.
• A property developer familiar with the process said the key criterion was controllability and loyalty, not leadership.

“They didn’t need a powerful leader, they needed someone malleable, someone who would follow instructions.”

Building the 007 Persona

Experts agree that the image of him as a master operative was constructed retrospectively. Claims about his clandestine activities in East Germany fall apart under examination. Fundamentally, he was an administrator and routine duties, a low-level clerk not involved with actual agent work.

Curiously, the move to framing him as a “007” may in part have been triggered by Daniel Craig’s arrival as 007. The grittier version led local outlets and online audiences to make comparisons with Putin. Edited images replacing Craig’s face with Putin’s appeared on Moscow streets, fueling the growing tendency to frame him as a local secret agent.

A Propaganda Win?

Given the casting, an star well-liked by Russian audiences, the Kremlin are likely to seize the opportunity to portray this choice as a minor diplomatic triumph. The film's omission of public dissent, the opposition, or prominent activists in the story, even though it includes recent years, is a welcome aspect for official messaging.

In Russian cinema, the president is often an omnipotent figure who never appears on screen. He is signaled through portraits or orders from on high. Now, he finally acquires a recognizable face—one that could unintentionally echo the very myths it might seek to examine.