🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the UK, and it seems it’s time for a re-evaluation. As time has passed, an celebration that began as a commemorative event of heritage, traditions and links between Black populations worldwide, has taken on a commercial tone, growing to encompass functions where individuals of African heritage are paid to address Caucasian groups about “unconscious bias” and supportive partnership. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests generated a rise in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The wave has reached its height, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what increasing understanding is for.

The History of Black History Month

Initially celebrated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with seven days of commemoration and observance in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the US and Canada in February, but also in autumn in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, Éire and the Holland.

The month has transformed since its inception, giving reduced attention to the histories of colonial slavery and fights for racial justice, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with talks and cultural events. But the method the month is celebrated is a indication of the contemporary political context. How it develops is a instructive case in how assimilation leads to weakening: the reshaping of Black History Month has hindered the objective of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how important it is to reevaluate Black History Month as much as the particular moment in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a revitalized conservative movement in the form of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the summer we witnessed the largest far-right rally in British history. a prominent political figure, the African descendant in charge of the Tory party, is a firm opponent of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a member of parliament gains confidence to say that a lack of white people in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. Meanwhile, ultra-nationalist movements are growing in the European continent as a entirety.

In the US, a massive attack against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been brought, frequently with success, to the highest courts of the state. A drive to remove Black history and experience from the records is under way. One of Donald Trump's first executive orders aimed at the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the prestigious establishment, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to change the national past” by portraying America “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Given these circumstances, the month illustrates how minimally it can be influential if it is confined to either obligatory business commemorations, or depoliticized commemorations of historical achievements, rather than challenging the realities of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its short period means that it is separated from the more extensive continuous action that is needed. A university professor, a educator at University of Greenwich, articulated it most accurately when she voiced worries about the temporary “tokenism” of the month. “The problem with embracing a superficial method”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a transient display rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Establishing how to alter, change and broaden actions for racial equality and recognition in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a inclination to just do away with events including Black History Month entirely, believing they are no longer suitable, or are relics of an era that has not worked.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and tradition of activism for racial justice – local anti-racism groups, inclusion and equity efforts, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an foundation that a significant effort has gone into. It is there not only to deteriorate as the situation evolves (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month appear as? Firstly, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is spread out through the year (as various establishments are already starting to implement), sections of its curriculum (particularly around prominent figures of color) included in academic syllabi. It would also be a time that does not shy away from political issues, and leaves space for people, particularly youth, to express their concerns and stories. What use is mere awareness of the past when it fails to address the present reality of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the urban areas? Establishments who observe it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to minor insults, but faced with the threats that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not treated with importance. In short, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and responsive. Maybe an entire name rebrand is required – Black History is Now Month.